http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/ By Dick DeShaw, MA, ABD Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:41:08 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/comment-page-1/#comment-653 dmmaseoseoseoseo Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:01:13 +0000 http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/#comment-653 This website has lots of really useful stuff on it. Thanks for informing me. This website has lots of really useful stuff on it. Thanks for informing me.

]]> http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/comment-page-1/#comment-622 Ano Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:10:25 +0000 http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/#comment-622 I really enjoyed reading this! Thank you I really enjoyed reading this! Thank you

]]> http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Steve Heighton Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:00:53 +0000 http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/#comment-31 Fascinating. The contention that we abuse the logical convenience of abstract terminology (like the word "tree") by failing to return to specific sources (i.e., the single pine that is neither a maple nor the pine beside it) is especially useful. And of course the ontological implications are huge. I feel like I understand Spinoza better now, and from a new angle. Thanks. Fascinating. The contention that we abuse the logical convenience of abstract terminology (like the word “tree”) by failing to return to specific sources (i.e., the single pine that is neither a maple nor the pine beside it) is especially useful. And of course the ontological implications are huge. I feel like I understand Spinoza better now, and from a new angle. Thanks.

]]> http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Barrett Pashak Tue, 27 May 2008 15:23:16 +0000 http://dickdeshaw.com/the-dawkins-delusion/#comment-29 Great post! Great post!

]]>