Comments on: Paul Dirac & Spinoza http://dickdeshaw.com/paul-dirac-spinoza/ By Dick DeShaw, MA, ABD Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:41:08 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: noveseidue http://dickdeshaw.com/paul-dirac-spinoza/comment-page-1/#comment-104 noveseidue Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:30:12 +0000 http://dickdeshaw.com/?p=149#comment-104 As Spinoza says, ” …science which does not consist in convictions based on reasons but in immediate union with the thing itself…” This means only that the foundation of science is based upon an immediate union and not upon a convinction. If science is intuitive or not is not the case. Maturing a convinction is possible only through an immediate union with what has been proven being the first axiom. The Immediate stands for : " without the mediation of what is imperfect" in order to be in contact with the real nature of things as they are in themselves As Spinoza says, ” …science which does not consist in convictions based on reasons but in immediate union with the thing itself…”

This means only that the foundation of science is based upon an immediate union and not upon a convinction. If science is intuitive or not is not the case. Maturing a convinction is possible only through an immediate union with what has been proven being the first axiom.
The Immediate stands for : ” without the mediation of what is imperfect” in order to be in contact with the real nature of things as they are in themselves

]]>