Spinoza on Science and Stress » Uncategorized

BUD THE BRAIN (p. 81-96) Emotions of Primitive Brain, The Hitting Impulse, Sports Metaphors

Dick — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:05:43 +0000

Reply to Noveseidue, (long overdue)

Dick — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:16:44 +0000

Here’s the Comment from Noveseidue, submitted on 2010/06/04 at 2:30pm -

As Spinoza says, ” …science which does not consist in convictions based on reasons but in immediate union with the thing itself…” This means only that the foundation of science is based upon an immediate union and not upon a convinction. If science is intuitive or not is not the case. Maturing a convinction is possible only through an immediate union with what has been proven being the first axiom. The Immediate stands for : ” without the mediation of what is imperfect” in order to be in contact with the real nature of things as they are in themselves

My Response – Sory for such a late reply to your comments. My server buried them in spam and after going through 84 possible spams, I discovered what you said. Particularly, “If science is intuitive or not is not the case…” Wittgenstein said: “Intuition is an unnecessary shuffle.” I am not talking abut intuition but rather what the ancient Greeks called, “demonstation.” (See p. 40 in my recent post, ‘Bud The Brain Explores Existence.” I appreciate your visit to my blog. I shall visit yours. Dick

A Vastly Simplified History of a Higher Power

kdick — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:58:39 +0000

We live in a big universe. It is getting bigger everyday.

But the universe is only about a fourth of the size of the dark matter and energy that surrounds it. Nobody knows if that is all there is. We did not even know about dark matter and energy till recently. Our planet is small.

Humans are very, very small. Billions of us crowd upon the surface of our earth. Of course, there are much smaller things, like bugs.

There are even much smaller things in our universe, like atoms.

Recently, scientists have discovered smaller things, like quarks. And even smaller things. But, like big things, no one knows if we will ever find all the small things.

Humans have always been curious about where we come from and why
we are here.

Something much more powerful than humans must’ve made things.
So they told stories:

Some of these stories had lots of imagination. We still use stories from the ancient Greeks to describe human behavior:

Some of the Greek stories began to describe events and things that humans experience.

Out of these stories, the Greeks discovered mathematics and logic, which are the languages of science. Of course, the same discoveries evolved in other countries from other people. We just have a more complete history of the Greeks who also discovered philosophy – the search for wisdom.

Two of these Greeks wrote books that changed how humans think. Aristotle described a system of how people used language in thinking – which is called logic.

Euclid put together the mathematics of the thinkers of his day. He wrote one of the most important books in human history – The Elements. His book developed the mathematics of space that we call geometry.

When I went to high school, 54 years ago, this was the geometry I was taught. Much to my regret now, golf was more important to me in those days. So I skipped most of my classes to play. It is much harder to learn Euclid’s geometry when I am 70 than it was when I was 16.

My drawings of the first 5 propositions of Euclid show how little I attended class. I did not learn to use a compass.

Until the 19th century, Aristotle’s logic and Euclid’s geometry were the only way these subjects were understood. Then, in the middle of the 19th century, G. Boole combined logic and mathematics. At around the same time, mathematicians discovered Euclid’s 5th postulate had alternative interpretations.
Since then, both geometry and logic have developed in the weird and wonderful ways that make a ‘science fiction’ outcome possible in modern science.
While the Greeks were discovering science, an alternative way of explaining our place and purpose in the world, developed in that hotbed of human unrest, the Middle East.
What now seems ironic, considering the history of that part of the world is that this alternate explanation was developed around the value of the individual person and our decent treatment of him or her, that is called, ‘ethics.’
The Zoroastrians led the way in the development of this idea and it was, in turn, picked up by the Jews, Muslims and Christians.

Christ expressed the idea of this alternative explanation: ‘The duty of humans is to love the Higher Power with all their heart, mind, and soul and to love their neighbor as themselves.’ (a paraphrase). There has not been a day of peace in that area since Zoroaster died.
Zoroaster, Moses, Christ and Mohammed, turned from stories like cow pie in the sky to a god like them, only much bigger and more powerful. This god could be a loving father but he also could be a vengeful king. He could be loving but he also could be angry and mean. But most important, this god only liked the people who worshiped him.

This belief has not done much for the idea of ethics upon which the religions were founded. Moreover, this god, unlike some in earlier religions, was always a man. This was interpreted to mean that believers could treat women badly.

Belief became more important than logic, mathematics or science. Especially for Christians who went into the dark age of the intellect. The Muslims who kept the Christian beliefs from invading them by force, kept Greek science and philosophy alive. They developed their own and gave humanity one of its greatest gifts in the Arabic numerical system.

Some Christians came back from their crusades in the Holy Land with Arabic numbers and Greek philosophy. Using mathematics, (they were probably the first successful accountants), these templers became very successful and rich. So the French King killed or exiled the templers by declaring them sinners and lovers of false gods and took their riches.

The damage was done. Greek science and philosophy crept into the belief systems of Christians and changed them. Christianity took on Plato’s idealism and Aristotle’s logic, but still filtered them through the idea of a super human in the sky. The renaissance had begun in the Christian world.

During all this time, the Jewish people had bounced from one persecution and exile, to another. Persecuted in Spain and Portugal, some of them landed in Holland, which was one of the freest countries at that time, in the world. Some of them were scholars.

At one time, Portugal was the learning centre of the world. Jews, Muslims, Christians and Asians all brought their scholarship to this area. The Muslims ruled Portugal and Spain but then Catholic countries conquered them. The Catholic church had an especially nasty organization called, ‘The Inquisition.’
Soon everyone who did not believe what the Catholic church believed was persecuted. Burning unbelievers at the stake was especially popular.

Jews were forced to convert to Christianity or face the wrath of the Inquisition. When the Jews fled to Holland, they brought their books and acquired knowledge with them.

One young Jewish student, who was going to be a rabbi, read Greek and oriental books on philosophy and poetry. As any Christian fundamentalist can tell you, no good could come of this.

This young student, whose name was Baruch Spinoza, especially liked Euclid. He said Euclid taught him how to think. (there’s that dangerous word again). He said Euclid was a model of what a thinker and writer should be. While he was also influenced by modern writers at that time, who were exploring ideas

In science and philosophy, like Bacon, Hobbes and Descartes; Euclid was Spinoza’s mentor. Spinoza found his idea of the Higher Power and ethics in Euclid’s ‘Common Notions’ in The Elements.

Needless to say, the churches did not like this. None of them did.

Spinoza was able to unite Catholics, Jews and Protestants, something no one else had been able to do. He united them in their hatred of him!

The Jews kicked Spinoza out of their church. The Catholics tried to destroy his books. (Since they did not control Holland, they could not burn him at the stake, much to their chagrin). The Calvinists were just plain nasty, and killed the political leader who protected Spinoza.

There is a story that the Jews sent a hit man to kill Spinoza. The hit man tried to stab Spinoza but the knife did not go through Spinoza’s thick coat. Spinoza kept that coat the rest of his life.

Where did footnote 5 go? I dunno. Guess it got lost in translation.

Fn 6. I identify with Spinoza. When I was a prison guard, a prisoner tried to stick a shiv in my gut. I caught it with my hand. But I was able to keep my hand. Fortunately, the knife did not stay in it.

( x2 = x) Hah! I finally got back to this footnote. I used the special symbol : x 2 = x for this footnote because it is important. If you want to know why x2 = x is special, read George Boole’s, Law of Thought. Way back I said “An atheist is a person who does not believe in God and that the Catholic, Protestants and Jews all called Spinoza an atheist. A modern humanist,
Richard Dawkins also calls Spinoza that but he means it in a positive way. They are wrong. Probably no one has ever lived who had a larger God than Spinoza. After all, his God is the ‘whole’ of everything. The reason we call all the other churches by specific names, like Jewish, Catholic, Protestant and so forth, is that they are all part of humanities attempt to understand the higher power. They think they are the whole, but the strife and disharmony they have created, says otherwise. Whew! Finally, end of footnote ( x2 = x).

Spinoza realized that the whole of nature is a higher power, one we know through science and worship when we obey the laws of nature in our life. However, unlike religious people, Spinoza did not say his definition of a higher power was the only one.

His is a definition we know through reason. It is okay to have a definition that leaves reason and uses faith instead. Faith, he said, can tell us two things about the higher power, as Jesus Christ remarked: fn7

You should love the higher power with all your heart, mind and soul.
You should love your neighbor as yourself.

But faith, Spinoza said, can tell us nothing about science, history and politics.

Fn 7 (Okay, footnotes should be at the bottom of the page, but I ran out of space. Maybe that’s why I never got my PhD. I never got my dissertation approved. For years I put, ABD on my resume till I realized most people thought it meant, ‘All But Dead.’)

Anyway, Spinoza was very fond of Jesus and the apostle Paul.

Now that we have identified Spinoza’s rational definition of a higher power as the whole of nature, what good does that do us?

Spinoza also had a philosophical definition of God as substance. Part I of the Ethics develops this definition. Philosophers have a virus in their thinking that does much what a virus does in a computer.

I call this virus; trying to explain too much. Spinoza called it an idea of an idea of an idea. Philosophers do so much explaining that they develop their own special language to do the explaining.

Anyone who has read Spinoza, knows that even though he wanted to be like Euclid and write in a clear, simple way, he suffered from the philosopher’s virus.

Emulating Euclid’s geometric method did not help. However, by the end of the Ethics (Part V), Spinoza admitted he had the virus, in Part I of the Ethics and that his true definition of the higher power was caught in the whole/part discussions.

Good thing, as George Boole demonstrated, in the Law of Thought, Spinoza’s philosophical discussion of God in Part I, is not very logical.

So what good for us is Spinoza’s definition of the higher power as the whole of nature?

Well, as Spinoza says, we can stop thinking that nature is for our use. We can realize we are only a part of the whole of nature. We can stop our ‘silly scolds,’ because everything does not work out for us as we like it to.

When Spinoza was a young man, things did not work out the way he wanted them to. He discovered wonderful truths in Euclid, but when he shared them, he lost his church, his business, family and friends.

Then someone tried to kill him. Today we would give Spinoza the PTSD label (Post Trauma Stress Disorder) that I was given when someone tried to kill me. I got angry. Spinoza could have gotten angry and been a danger to others. Or he could have tried to kill himself as I did.

Footnote 8 Spinoza got labels – Atheist, Unbeliever and some not fit for polite society. But rather than use what happened to him as an excuse, he tried to understand it. He said he was,’ like a man suffering from a fatal illness” unless he could find a good that could help him live in this mixed up world. The good he found in Euclid: “…it is the knowledge of the union that the mind has with the whole of nature.”

Spinoza realized he was sick, (as I was). So he spent his life writing about a cure for sick thinking while living a life that showed there is a victory over the condition.

When my job got so bad that I wanted to kill myself, I returned to Spinoza, not as an academic philosopher, but as a sick man. Like Bill Wilson who started Alcoholics Anonymous, I needed help.

Spinoza says our lives are like a ship tossed in a storm at sea. We lose our natural desire to survive when we do not know who we really are and our place in the higher power or the whole of nature. We need our thinking cured.

Bill Wilson, of A.A., like Spinoza, realized he had a sickness that was going to kill him. A friend gave him William James’ book, The Varieties of Religious Experience. James was strongly influenced by what he called, Spinoza’s healthy mindedness.

Bill Wilson’s Twelve Steps of AA were the result. He started an organization that has been a blessing to many sick lives.
Here are his first three steps.
1) We admitted we were powerless over alcohol – that our lives
had become unmanageable.
2) Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could
Restore us to sanity.
3) Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood him.

The success of Alcoholics Anonymous is a result of Bill’s healthy mindedness. We can substitute any circumstance of life that affects our emotions and lives. Understanding is the key to Spinoza’s healthy mindedness. We can ignore the anthropomorphism.

This is a vastly simplified history of a higher power, one that Spinoza defined. I have suggested some uses it can have for our lives.

Mind Battles ?

Dick — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:50:49 +0000

Stress disease in soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq, was recently addressed in a two-part CBS television series called, ‘Mind Battles.’ . While well-intentioned, the program suffered from the two fallacies that usually occur in discussions on stress disease; 1) that it is a mental health issue and 2) that only a percentage of front-line workers have it.

Every single individual who works for any time in a front line occupation has this physical affliction that changes their physiological functioning, whether or not the usual symptoms are present (ie: anger, anxiety, depression, out of control emotions). The disease may not be overtly manifest in some individuals who serve as carriers. Only their families and close associates may suspect something is amiss.

In this respect, stress disease may be the predominant condition of our present century, a concern, not just for soldiers returning from battle, but for us all. The difference is one of degree and not of kind.

When the atom was split, it was discovered that a disruption of the smallest bit of the universe may have far-reaching consequences for humanity. This is true for the small adrenal gland that sits in the body on top of the kidneys. Hormones secreted by this gland, have three purposes in survival of the fittest; maintenance of the heart, stress control and the adrenaline reaction of flight or fight.

Researchers have discovered that when an individual is in a prolonged stress situation, the hormone that controls stress wears out. Then the adrenaline that causes fight or flight flows unhindered throughout the body. Those who have lived in fight situations can testify that adrenaline can take you very high. You can actually come to live for those highs, becoming an adrenaline junkie.

As a correctional officer, I did.

Any junkie who lives for the high knows the down is horrendous. CBS television reported in November, 2007, that almost 120 Iraq veterans a week commit suicide, (over 6000 a year, twice the national average). Before I left my job in prison and even after, I wanted to die.

But what about the mental? Baruch Spinoza said,”…most errors result solely from the incorrect applications of words to things.” “Mind,’ and its accompanist, ‘mental,’ is that kind of misapplication. There is a metaphysical carryover from Plato, incorporated into the Christian religion and instilled into Western Philosophy through Descartes, the separation of the body from thought.

Because of this separation, most of us think emotions are mental. The seventeenth century philosopher, Spinoza and the twenty-first century neuroscientist, Antonio Damasio, have taught me otherwise. It is through these two writers that I am on the way to recovery from stress disease and the misleading label of Post Trauma Stress Disorder that was applied to me.

Like all other labels ascribed to stress disease, PTSD describes its symptoms, rather than its cause. It is like thinking of chicken pox as spots rather than an infection. Both Spinoza and Damasio deny that the mind is a separate entity from the body. Mind and body are two expressions of the same thing that have different functions in its unity.

Everything we think is conceived through the experiences we have in our body. These experiences occur because things in the universe force their existence upon our thinking, through our bodies. My thinking does not create things but rather things create my thinking.

We could get rid of the words, ‘mind’ and ‘mental,’ and use the word, ‘brain’ as the philosopher, Gilbert Ryle suggested, except that the two previous words convey a wealth of meaning that has been acquired through history. Substituting the word, ‘synapse’ does not carry the same weight.

Spinoza says it is the essence of human beings, in fact of everything that exists, to strive to preserve its own being. He calls this striving the ‘conatus.’ Damasio puts this word in a modern context: “What is Spinoza’s conatus in current biological terms? It is the aggregate of dispositions laid down in brain circuitry that, once engaged in internal or environmental conditions, seeks both survival and well-being.”

These dispositions, Damasio says, are ‘homeostatic regulations’ that range from ‘a nesting of the simple within the complex.’ He breaks them up into 5 groups.

On the bottom is metabolic regulation, basic reflexes and immune responses. Next comes pain and pleasure behaviors. Then drives and motivations. At the next level are what we think of as emotions, such as fear and anger. All four levels are body functions. It is only when all of these dispositions congregate into feelings does thinking enter the equation.

Damasio says emotions are not feelings. Emotions are from the body. Feelings are our thinking responses that try to make sense of what is happening in our body as it reacts to our environment. In modern society, this thinking response is often inadequate.

Emotions battle with our minds. Several days after a prisoner tried to kill me by sticking a shiv in my gut, a cement truck pulled out in front of me as I drove my small Japanese car. Immediately, with my wife screaming, I tried to run that huge vehicle off the road. My adrenalin had signaled, ‘fight’ and my thinking responded inadequately. Anger swept through my body, the emotion battling with my mind. As Spinoza says, reason will never win against a strong emotion. The only response that can win against a strong emotion is a stronger emotion.

Ultimately, it was this stronger emotion, love for my wife that won. I let the cement truck win, as he surely would have, anyway. My wife’s distress had penetrated my understanding, the place in our consciousness where strong emotion resides.

Our thinking or reason, Spinoza says, is only a staircase where we climb to what we know already exists: ‘the union which the mind has with the whole of nature.’ This is the knowledge which gives humans our strongest emotion; love for a truth which is greater than ourselves.

Bill Wilson, the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, understood this in his twelve step program: 1) ‘We admitted we were powerless over alcohol, that our lives had become unmanageable. 2) Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to understanding.’

These are the first two steps in recovery from alcoholism as they are for those who suffer from this adrenaline addiction of stress disease. We can call this higher power, God, nature or whatever, as long as we realize that there is a greater truth or reality than the prison of solipsism that locks up our age behind the barriers of misdirected emotions and inadequate thinking.

Having said this, let us return to our soldiers whom we send to fight. Stress disease begins when front line workers are trained in a ‘fight’ response. It is called ‘combat’ in the army and ‘security’ in corrections and police work.

You are trained to react, not to think, trained as a team member. Thinking and individualism can lead to the failure of the mission and the possible death of all concerned. How else could a perfectly intelligent and sane person be expected to advance and engage in a fire fight or walk down a prison range when prisoners are rioting, shouting and throwing fire bombs?

After training, the individual goes to work, only to find that 95% of their time is spent waiting for something to happen. Then something goes down and in the frenzied action, confusion and sheer excitement that follows, only his training and adrenaline carries him through the engagement. What a high!

If there are no causalities, the emotions remain high but if there are some after the conflict, adrenaline drops him down into the deep sadness that accompanies loss and the guilt and relief that a survivor experiences. The mind races over the incident, trying to make some sense of it, but it only spins its wheels on conflicting emotions.

The boring hours or days between the next engagement is like stagnant water full of mosquito larva. The mind spins and breeds inadequate thinking. The person turns to comradeship, war stories and humor, (usually black), for solace. The shared experiences of team members in dangerous jobs are seldom like those anywhere else in society. A special bond occurs.

In the days that follow between adrenalin highs of engagement and adrenaline downs of boredom, the body changes and the adrenal gland no longer controls stress but only lives for the highs and suffers the downs. You are an adrenaline junkie.

Somehow you survive and leave the theatre of engagement for the world. But you no longer fit there. Your fight skills are no longer needed. They begin to express themselves in inappropriate contexts. The world no longer seems exciting. Even things that once excited you have lost their gloss. Your loved ones do not understand you and you drift apart from your remaining comrades.

Your mind has lost the battle with the emotions. You lose the main drive of existence, to survive. This is the worse case scenario but every frontline survivor takes their wounds back into the world and limps along with them. If you are fortunate enough to receive counseling, when you come back to the world, you are told that your thinking is wrong. This is something you already know.

If your counselor is as practical as an A.A. counselor, you may get some help in learning what triggers your emotions and how to avoid them. The best help found for front-line troops has been, like for alcoholics, support groups of other adrenaline junkies who have been there.

However, much of what passes for counseling is only mind games played by advocates who believe in mind battles. The adrenaline junkie gets excuses but little support for recovery. Neuroscience has discovered, (as did Spinoza centuries ago), the connection between the emotions and the body.

Some fields in psychology are also leaning in this direction but not until we get rid of the idea of ‘Mind Battles,’ the psychoanalytic deluge will still mislead damaged individuals whether they suffer the stress in war or even at the office.